Tuesday, January 31, 2012

“That Photo of Addie’s Open Grave Was Shocking and Sad…”

Refutation of Addie Hoyt Fargo blog dated 1/31/2012

Here we go again.  I don't understand why Rosemary cannot get it into her head that when all the materials in a grave are compressed into a 3 X 3 foot area that the original grave depth is impossible to calculate.   I guess that's because it lacks the drama she so strongly relies on to convince people that she writes the truth.........regardless of how far fetched it is in her writing.
Do what I suggested.  Take a probe to your local cemetery and start probing the graves from about 1890 - 1900.  Prove it to yourself. 
In deference to the funeral directors that state the grave could be 6 to 8 feet...... Really?  These graves were hand dug.  Apply some logic for a change.  8 feet in heavy earth is a two day job for two diggers and there isn't room for three diggers.  And did those funeral directors study burial standards from a century (or more) ago?  I doubt it.
I suspect, once again, that Rosemary has twisted the facts to suit her own story.  The idea of digging 6 feet to find a century old grave is prefaced by the notion the grave sank over time.  And if there had been a vault the sinking might have actually happened, in some soil types.  The soil content was very clay, not sand, in this location.
In this particular blog entry Rosemary confirms what I've stated repeatedly.  The first grave artifacts were found at 34 inches.  That should adequately refute Rosemary's claim there was only 18 inches of dirt on top of the coffin.  It really doesn't matter (unless you want to be overly dramatic) since it's clear that nothing was where it was originally placed.  Originally there probably was plenty of soil on top of the coffin.  Again............it's impossible to know the natural forces that moved the grave contents around.
I did notice a couple of the desperate housewives of Norfolk jumped on the grave depth.    That's cute...the real believers.....too bad they are so, so easily led of into the swamp.

Read my blog with the complete text of the passage in 'A History of Lake Mills' which is the only written historical record.  The murder rumor is just that..............a rumor.  The rest of the 'evidence' is circular logic that I will expose as time permits.

Rosemary's claim about a proper burial is unfounded.  The hardware is beautiful and I will post the pictures.  The casket had a viewing window for E J, and others, to see his wife.

It wasn't E J's job to get the burial permit, the grave was adequate considering, at the time, people who died of certain diseases got buried in a hurry.  And the claim that there was not a proper burial is unfounded.  Simply invented for dramatic purposes since there wasn't historical records other than the local newspaper.  I doubt the towns folk rushed out to the grave of someone who died of a dreaded disease.  Now would E J want to put these people at risk....but that's logic for you.....explains a lot of stuff.

Again, prying the jewelry from her cold dead body????  Who is Rosemary trying to fool; besides the desperate housewives of Norfolk.   Wedding jewelry is undefined in this blog.  For all anyone knows the jewelry is still in the grave.  Since Addie was ill and in bed it's unlikely she had much jewelry on.  Again, think about it.  And not all the skeletal remains were found.

There is quite a bit of history about E J Fargo all over Lake Mills in various references.  Mary Wilson tried to pull it together but it was not her goal to write a history of the Fargo's.  Rosemary is correct about one thing....."A History of Lake Mills" is the only historical reference that mentions the rumor that Addie died as a result of violence.............and that was hearsay.
E J was a pillar of the community and committed large amounts of his time and resources to better Lake Mills.  The list of his accomplishments goes on and on, along with the other Lake Mills Fargos.

5 comments:

  1. Rosemary Thornton states that Addie Fargo was buried without a service and yet the Lake Mills Leader clearly states in her obituary that at 10:00 am, family and close friends gathered at her grave showering her coffin with roses and saying their last goodbyes. Of course the minister was present to conduct a service.
    Rosemary's own investigator, David Spriggs, states "you cannot prove a positive from a negative" on Addie's facebook page when researching a connection between the Fargo's of Lake Mills and Fargo's of Wells/Fargo fame. But when confronted in the in the comments part of the newspaper, David Srpiggs states "the paper has been read and reread with no mention of a quarantine". Can you possibly imagine the response you would get from a judge (after he stopped laughing) if you were to try to present evidence by stating that something must not have happened because it wasn't in the paper. Duh!
    Fact: quarantine was an accepted and expected response to the spread of disease in 1901. Addie's obit was 10 column inches on the front page of the Lake Mills Leader stating her cause of death was diphtheria. EJ's oldest daughter missed her graduation a week after Addie's death. Rosemary posits that the death in the family was the reason Maddie missed her graduation. Nice try, however... An aside: look at the photo of the family on the steps of the Fargo home; if Maddie could get any further away from Addie she would be accross the street. Hmm.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My apologies, I stated that Maddie missed her graduation, I meant Elsie.

      Delete
    2. I think you are correct that it was Mattie that missed high school graduation. I would have to look up some documents but Elsie (I think) graduated from the University of Wisconsin circa 1898....again.....I would need to check the dates on Elsie.....
      I have no idea what David Spriggs role in this is. I think he's just a tool for Rosemary. The idea that a newspaper article on quarantine would need to be genereated for the E J Fargo household is a bit ludicrous.

      Delete
  2. I watched the Usteam. It was stated at the beginning there would be a Q and A at the end. It wasn't there, unless my computer cut off the end. Was there one? Often that part of a presentation provides more information from people in the community than the talk itself. And, What was the reaction of the audience? I ask because the speaker clearly doesn't have knowledge of historical research and societal customs of the time, such as the age difference betweet Enoch and Addie (not unusual), remarrying following a wife's death. I've tried to trace the origin of statements made in this and on other sites and find it hard as threads have disappeared when I try to go back and review them. The title and author of the book mentioned in the talk were not given. Also, now it pops up that Addie's wedding ring was removed from her hand. ?? Where the heck does that come from?? Even if it was - I am not knowledgeable about burial customs and don't pretend to, but it would seem to make sense in terms of grave robberies esp since it's obvious the Fargos had money and material possessions. Much is made in the presentation about the logistics of the night she died, such as now we have to find gravediggers. People died back then, at all times of the day. Diptheria and a myriad of other things caused sudden death. Does one really believe that in that day and age someone would actually think, Oh my god. There has been a death. Who do we call?? And when we do call, won't the minister/undertaker/gravedigger be shocked at getting a call in middle of the night. Al

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Q and A at the end is cut off and not sure where it could be retrieved. I suspect there wasn't much open Q and A, anyway. My lengthy experience working with groups of people indicates the discussion is normally carried outside the room.....rather than in front of peers.
      The wedding jewelry comment is a shot in the dark like far too many other claims.

      Delete

Leave comments, please